New video: “Dying to Get In”

October 18, 2009

Here’s a new video that I made with my friends:

We submitted it to the Organizing for America video challenge and the Techsoup Digital Storytelling Event.

Here’s more information about the production and healthcare reform.

Please let me know what you think: rate, comment and share via YouTube!


Step up! Be in a video to SUPPORT healthcare reform on October 10

September 18, 2009

On Saturday October 10 in Santa Monica, I’m shooting a funny video short (30 seconds long) in SUPPORT OF HEALTHCARE REFORM. We’ll submit it to Obama’s video contest.

We need you (& your friends ) as stars or extras for the shoot. I can’t tell you much more unless you’re available to come (don’t want to spoil the surprise).

Here are some folks we need to find:

Picture 1
1. Big tall muscley kinda scary-looking guy
2. Skinny model-type woman
3. Hipster couple
4. Young mother and child (toddler)
5. Older gentleman
6. Lots of people with visible wounds/bandages, in wheelchairs or on crutches (Bring your own!)

Let me know if you or folks you know (who match above) are available. I have a treatment and script but want to keep a lid on it if possible.

RSVP for location information: Send an email to will (at) aquifermedia.com


Online Video as Art (gasp!) & What This Means for Movement-Building

September 8, 2009

Picture 7Of all my beach reading over the Labor Day weekend, I was most impressed by Virginia Heffernan’s new article “Uploading the Avant-Garde” in the New York Times magazine. Heffernan’s thesis that YouTube is establishing “a home for the vernacular avant-garde” is something I’ve been thinking about, especially in regards to video and social justice movement-building.

These days, you can’t help but hear that digital media technology is having a profound effect on our society: sectors from newspapers to photography to the movie industry are all trying to come to terms with the new emerging reality. Even so, some of the same old questions persist, like the place of “The Professional” vs. “the Amateur”. Some folks continue to see the superiority of professionally-created media. A few years ago I read Andrew Keen’s anti-internet screed, “The Cult of the Amateur: How Today’s Internet is Killing Our Culture” and found his observations interesting if not a tad alarmist. It seems to me that digital technology is here now and our task is figuring out to make the most of it. I’m not denying the important place of professionally-made content: I’m only saying that we should respect amateurs for the surprises they might have in store for us. ParadiseGardens

For example, whenever I bring up “The Academy vs. Folk Art” in discussions about user-generated digital video, I’m often met with puzzled looks. To me, it makes sense. Last summer, I made a pilgrimage to “Paradise Gardens“, the landmark built by renowned “outsider artistHoward Finster in Summerville, Georgia. Like many self-taught or naive artists, Finster was definitely seen as an howardphotooutsider, perhaps even a little nutty.  But Finster saw himself as a man of visions. When I walked around the weathered remains of his chaotic sculpture garden/art park, I found myself admiring this vision and the gumption that lead him to build such a place. Finster learned his artistic skills by simply making art. In much the same way, amateur filmmakers attempted to create celluloid versions of Finster’s Paradise Gardens. Not long ago, I read 17laverents190the obituary of Sidney Laverents who created a nine-minute short “Multiple SIDosis” that is now listed in the National Film Registry alongside Francis Ford Coppola’s “Apocalypse Now” and Martin Scorsese’s “GoodFellas.” (Note: I’m doing further research on more examples beyond white men: suggestions welcome…)

In the 21st century, digital videographers are also experimenting and learning while doing… but online. As Heffernan points out, “what’s surprising is how little the homemade videos [on YouTube] resemble the pro goods. Sure, there are parodies of mainstream clips here and there, but mostly the amateurs are off on their own, hatching new genres.” Just as Finster unwittingly created a new genre of visual art and Laverents extended our understanding of what is film is, we’re witnessing something similar happening online.

So what does this mean for movement-building for social justice? For one, we can all create and distribute media today like never before. Instead of geographically-specific art-sharing locations like Howard Finster’s art park in rural Georgia and Sidney Laverents living room, we now have the ability to share our social justice-themed art with lots more people… immediately. Of course, both men honed their technical skills over the years. Their successes created entirely new genres. In much the same way, videographers can create art… but it needs to be good: effective, compelling and interesting.

What excites me about video is that it is often collaborative. While it’s possible to make something on your own, the best video content always seems to come from interactive between people either in conceptualization, production and/or distribution. And collaboration, after all, is the cornerstone of civic engagement. It seems to me that if a group of people can see a video through to completion, they’ve learned something about collaborating, something that they can apply in their larger civic lives and social movements.

To quote Margaret Mead (as many have), “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed, citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.” Maybe we can add “…one video at a time.”




Learning while Gathering Video about Adult English Language Programs

August 5, 2009

The above video is one of four that I created as a recent project with the Asian Pacific American Legal Center on adult English as a Second Language programs in southern California and how they assist the integration of new immigrants. California has the largest adult education system in the country that is supported in large part by state funding. Over the past few months, I visited a dozen adult education schools in Los Angeles and Orange counties. I met determined administrators, passionate teachers and lots of eager students.

Unfortunately, timing played a critical role in this project. We quickly found that, due to budget negotiations in the State Assembly, the ground was shifting beneath us as well as for the adult school and community college administrators we contacted. While the current fiscal crisis in the state has forced these schools to pare their classes, these programs are pressing forward to meet the demand from their communities.

I enjoyed working on all of the videos but I still think “Finding Their Way in English” is the one closest to my ideal of community participation. I filmed the footage but the students came up with the idea and volunteered for the acting. Like so much social media, these videos were built on real world relationships. It took several weeks of visiting the class and getting to know them gradually. We talked a lot about how much they appreciated the English classes and wanted to see them continue. The final “script” was how the students thought they could portray the importance of English to them: finding their way in a new country. We also talked about the importance of storytelling in video.

Including action steps for viewers was also challenge. We realized there are multiple ways that viewers could respond. See this anchor page for more information on how you can further support these English language learners.

(Special thanks to Moby for the donated music.)

Webisodes on adult English language programs:


Check out new video promo for VideoActive training

July 23, 2009

Sure, it’s goofy, but we needed a video to promote the video training.

What do you think of it?


If you’re in the Los Angeles area in August, come join VideoActive training!

July 14, 2009

Picture 4

I’m excited about this training that I’m doing with the LA Media Reform Group of California Common Cause and Urban & Environmental Policy Institute at Occidental College. It’s a hands-on workshop to teach community organizations and non-profits (in teams of 2 or 3 members each) how to make and distribute video shorts for social justice and progressive social change. The training will take place on two Saturdays in August, at Occidental College, Eagle Rock, Los Angeles, California.

Here’s the broad brush agenda:

Day 1: Saturday, August 22, 2009 from 11:00am – 3:00pm

Getting Started (Pre-production and planning for filming)

Through a discussion with videographers about how they conceived their project, learn what makes effective storytelling and how to spur the public to act. Also, gain tips on how to use a Flip Camera to best convey your message and capture your intended audience’s attention

Day 2: Saturday, August 29, 2009 from 11:00am – 3:00pm

Putting It Together (Editing and distribution)

Get hands-on training for the Flip Camera editing software and how to upload your video online. Learn how to get your video seen by the world. Participants can use the week between trainings to videotape content.

If you’re interested in participating, register here.

If you can’t make the training, don’t fear! We’re planning on another round in the Fall!


8 reasons to film your own press conference (or why YouTube is a free kitten)

July 2, 2009

Henry_Wade_1963_press_conference_NYWTS

Lately I’ve been filming a lot of press conferences for local advocacy groups and a common response I get is “Will anyone really watch this stuff on YouTube?“ They have a point… to a point. But I still think filming press conferences is an important exercise for creating and posting content online. Here are my reasons:

1. YouTube channels are free kittens (or cultivating an audience). Someone once said, open source software is “free as in free kittens.” The same is true of tools like YouTube and other video sites: They might be free but they need care and nurturing to thrive. The public judges your organization based on how active your channel is. If you only have a few videos from your annual dinner, most online audiences will think that you’re not serious about using this technology or, even worse, out of step and behind the times. Keeping your channel active is the means of building and cultivating your audience, especially for when you need them in the future for fundraising or urgent actions. In this case, something is better than nothing.

2. Reviewing your public speaking skills. Everyone is curious about the way they look on camera. Taping the presentations you or staff make gives you the opportunity to review them critically and improve. Did you read too much and not look at the audience? Did you speak too softly or too quickly? Colleagues might be able to tell you these things but why not judge for yourself?

3. Documenting your organization’s work. Nonprofits have always struggled with letting the public know what they’ve been up to with the money they’ve donated. Newsletters and e-mail blasts are two examples of this need. But why not record your organization’s work in action, literally? For now, maybe press conferences are often the best way to do this. Videos give your supporters a taster or sense of the events your events, even if they can’t participate. Staff are summarizing and making compelling cases to a corporate media audience, exactly what you try to capture in words for your newsletters. If you want to, include video links in your e-newsletters to further impress your supporters.

4. Fact checking the media. “Did I really say that?” These days anyone can report the news but questions of accuracy and truthfulness are still of utmost concern. Video helps you fact check what was said at a press conference. It also contextualizes the quotes or sound bites that corporate media gloms onto.

5. Controlling and magnifying your message. Advocacy groups are often frustrated by how corporate or Big Media sometimes doesn’t get the story right or even cover the story at all. By videotaping your press conference, you are able to control what your major points and concerns are without hoping and praying that intermediaries will convey it correctly. If you’re building an audience online, you can communicate directly with the public without relying on a third party that might not get it right… or even show up at the press conference.

6. Practice using technology. In the entire history of human communications technology, internet video is very very new. Just like email, social networking websites and digital photography, we’re all still learning how video works. As Clay Shirky has said, “Tools don’t get socially interesting until they get technologically boring.” If you and your organization get in the habit of shooting, editing, approving and uploading video, it won’t be as big a deal. Your staff will become accustomed to the process and be able to put aside technical concerns in moving a project forward. You can also argue that it will help you save money. If you build your organization’s internal capacity to make video, you’re less reliant on “professionals” for small amateur jobs (As a consultant, should I be writing that?)

7. Creatively thinking about distribution. If you’re creating content, you have to also work to get people to see it. Apparently over 80% of online video’s viewership comes through blog posts. In other words, what bloggers do you know that you can rely on to help with distributing your videos? Have you been participating in online discussions and commenting on posts? Are you an active member on Facebook and Twitter? If you’re done the work in creating “street cred” online, folks will be more willing to share the videos you make. The more often you do this, the better. Bloggers, social network addicts and tweeters are always looking for visual images to link with their stories. If you have cultivated relationships with them and they look to you for primary sources like video, you’ll be able to depend on them when you really need them, like when you make that urgent video you’ve really invested time and energy, that you’re super proud of and need help distributing.

8. Learning what makes good online videos and changing approach. As some of you may have been thinking, are press conferences still really the best way to get out your message? This brings me back to the initial skepticism of posting these types of videos. Addmittedly press conferences don’t make the most compelling video content. Check out any of the videos below and you’ll see that many rank only in the 100-200 views range if that. But, in this case, the final product is not really the point.

Above are seven other reasons that filming even seemingly boring stuff is good for you and your organization. But the biggest reason is that it stretches YOUR thinking about online video. Once the technology of creating and distributing becomes rote and the internal processes of your organization start viewing video like creating simple Word documents, you’ll be able to take a step back and think about strategies for engaging your audience more effectively and spurring them to action. Maybe you won’t do press conferences as much. Maybe they’ll die away completely. If you’ve invested the time in practicing, you’ll be able to create even better content that will be better suited to reach your advocacy goals.

—————————-

Examples of recent press conference events that I’ve filmed (This is partially a ploy to get more viewers):

1. “Slice of life” or summary of an event: Short clips of different aspects of the event but not coverage of every minute.

2. Filming the entire event: Each speaker or event component is uploaded as separate videos and organized as a playlist. Everything is filmed except breaks and transitions between speakers.

3. Do you have other examples of video styles to cover press conferences and other organizational events?


Students rally for DREAM Act across the country

June 26, 2009

I filmed the above footage at the Los Angeles DREAM Graduation event that Dream Team LA held on June 23, 2009 to coincide with the national graduation happening in Washington D.C. on the same day. The graduation featured student testimonials as well as a call to action.

By the way, I filmed it with my new HD Flip Camera. If you go to the video on the YouTube site, try clicking the HD button on the lower right side. The zoom is a little better on this version of the camera. Overall, what do you think of the picture?


Congress, can you hear me now?

May 1, 2009

Here’s a video I made for the Center for Community Change and their Mobile Action Network. Obviously we parodied those ubiquitous Verizon commercials. I’m itching to make another one like the new commercial in an ice cream shop.

Here’s the Spanish version:


User-generated Content and the Fear of Losing Control: Lessons from “In the Motherhood”?

April 7, 2009

picture-1User-generated content is a cornerstone of social media. And “UGC” is changing the way we look at media. The very idea of user-generated content often strikes fear into the hearts of many nonprofit advocacy organizations simply because of the supposed loss of control. But it seems that nonprofits are not the only ones with this concern.

Just in case you forgot what TV is, a new show on ABC “In the Motherhood” has shed new light on the tension around user-generated content. It’s also caused some interesting comparisons between between the Web video world and the traditional television industry. Brian Stetler of the New York Times discussed this difference in an interesting article on the series here.

If you haven’t heard of the series, it was originally started as an ad campaign where mothers were invited to send in funny personal stories that could be incorporated into the web series. But when the series moved to ABC Television, it ran afoul of the writers’ union agreements. Turns out that viewers are still invited to send in their stories: there’s just no promise that they’ll be used in any way. But the latest news is that ABC is not ordering any new episodes and may not bode well for the series.

For me, this is an interesting story about New and Old media colliding. In the case of “In the Motherhood”, something about the original conceptpicture-3 made the content interesting and new. But when folks tried to retool it for television and dealt with the realities of producing something in a broadcast medium, something was lost.

For nonprofits, there may be a lesson here. User-generated content is a new and vibrant way to interact with constituents and donors. But it may also change the way you do business… in a good way. After all, aren’t nonprofts accountable to the public, either through their boards or membership? User-generated content should be seen as fostering leadership development; getting members of the public to think through and create something of use to your organization.

Of course, there are still issues about what members of the public possess the technological tools necessary to create user-generated content about the issue you work on (i.e. the “Digital Divide“). This is a real and persistant concern. But if nonprofits could begin small experiments is creating content WITH constituents offline (i.e. video), imagine what this transfusion might mean to our work!

What do you think? Know of any examples where user-generated content augmented (or even compromised) the advocacy of a nonprofit organization?